Pop Quiz: All in the Family

Oh, my pets... things have been utterly lunatic in The Underworld lately. The latest chapter in the serial that is my life is that my satellite provider completely, without warning, ERASED FOREVER my entire library of saved programs on my DVR.  So there went several posts down the tubes, including part of my proposed 400th one.  Anyway, while I'm wringing the tears out of my hanky, I have had to resort to a different sort of post while I attempt to get my act together again.  If you don't enjoy the quiz, hopefully a couple of the pictures may be interesting at least!

Today's Pop Quiz will involve a celebrity whose parent or child is/was also a performer and you will have to guess who they are.  In most, if not all, cases, the less famous (or well known these days) celeb will be the lead-off and the answer is the slightly more familiar entity.  Stick around at the end for one last amusing photo!

1. This memorably imposing and dour-looking actor is Vic Morrow, perhaps best known for the WWII series Combat! (1962-1967), but also the guest star of many TV shows (such as The Rifleman, Police Story and Charlie's Angels) and supporting actor in movies (including 1955's The Blackboard Jungle, 1958's God's Little Acre, 1960's Cimarron and 1976's The Bad News Bears.)  His final role was in Twilight Zone: The Movie (1983) thanks to a horrific on-set accident in which a helicopter decapitated him and killed the two children he was filming with.  His daughter grew up to be a critically popular actress known for her edgy, immersed performances.

2. Fans of the 1975 thriller The Stepford Wives (the only big-screen version that I acknowledge!) will recall this man, who played Katharine Ross' husband.  He maintained an acting career for about two decades from 1966 to 1987, but ultimately switched gears to directing.  His square-jawed daughter (who also appeared as his child in Wives) went on to a successful career in the movies chiefly from the mid-'80s to the mid-'90s.

3. This young lady's name is Tisha Sterling, a pretty actress with striking, large eyes.  As a girl, she toiled in plenty of television shows from The Alfred Hitchcock Hour to Batman, segueing to movies such as Coogan's Bluff (1968) with Clint Eastwood and Norwood (1970) with Glen Campbell.  She's shown in the inset with James Franciscus in the 1970 TV-movie Night Slaves.  She inherited her huge eyes from her famous mother, a 1930s beauty who had her own film series in the 1940s before conquering TV in the 1950s.  Sterling played the younger version of her mother's character in her mother's final movie.

4. This one's such a gimme, I should even include it, but we must balance out the more difficult ones, mustn't we?  Stage actress Blythe Danner, who went on to film success in 1776 (1972), The Great Santini (1979) and more recently Meet the Parents (2000) is the mother of an actress who achieved tremendous popularity (and even managed to wrangle an Oscar.)  The daughter has lately become associated with a popular, CGI-laden, superhero film franchise.

5. Most of you won't be too familiar with this young man, Kyle Johnson, who enjoyed a brief run at acting in the mid-'60s to the mid-'70s (starring in The Learning Tree, shown here, in 1969, regarding social and racial issues in small town 1920s Kansas.)  He also popped up in Rock Hudson's 1971 dark comedy Pretty Maids All in a Row.  Johnson's mother was a groundbreaking TV actress who was and is part of a major fan favorite franchise so great that the followers were given their own name.

6. Here we have television actress Whitney Blake, a TV actress from the 1950s through the 1970s who costarred on the Shirley Booth sitcom Hazel (1961-1965) and guest-starred on many other shows.  her daughter became a highly-successful television actress as well as part of a 1976-1980 drama series and then a 1981-1989 sitcom in which she, too, played the mom.  She proceeded to star in popular TV-movies and still works frequently today.

7. These two writer-producer-director gents are brothers, Paul and Chris Weitz.  They have collaborated on several movies from the hugely-popular gross-out comedy American Pie (1999) to the far more sensitive About a Boy (2002) to the big-budget misfire The Golden Compass (2007), among other things.  Their father was a German fashion designer and writer named John Weitz.  Their mother, prior to having her sons and retiring, was a promising, thriving actress who won a Golden Globe and was nominated for an Oscar for one of her more memorable roles.

8. This young man is Paul Clemens, who starred as an unfairly accused murderer in the 1978 TV-movie A Death in Canaan before landing supporting roles in the 1979 movies Promises in the Dark and The Passage.  As seen here, he also starred in 1982's The Beast Within as the product of rape between a woman and diabolical creature!  His acting career petered out for the most part, though he did segue into art (his father was a portrait painter of the same name.)  His mother is a thrice Oscar-nominated actress who enjoyed considerable fame, including one film that is a bonafide family classic for the ages.

9. The glamour-puss shown here is Marjorie Lord, the TV wife of Danny Thomas on The Danny Thomas Show (known also as Make Room for Daddy) from 1957-1964.  The glam quotient is notable since she replaced Jean Hagen on the show after the first three seasons, partly because Thomas didn't approve of Hale's appearance.  The two-time Emmy nominee (three, actually, because of a special category) was allegedly once told by Thomas, "For God's sake, Jean.  Put on a little lipstick!" Anyway, Hagen wasn't happy on the show, but Lord was.  Lord's daughter went on to significant fame as an actress, scoring an Oscar nomination for her part in a major blockbusting thriller.

10. This is another pretty easy one.  Sean Astin got started in television and movies as a preteen, with The Goonies (1985) a cult favorite.  Later, he starred in Toy Soldiers (1991) and Rudy (1993) before the triple-whammy of the three The Lord of the Rings movies (in 2001, 2002 and 2003.)  He maintains a very busy career now.  His mother was also a teen star of stage, screen and television and won an Oscar while still a youth.

11. This man was a reliable character actor in movies from the 1910s until his premature death at only age fifty-seven of a liver ailment.  As a Warner Brothers contract player, he wound up in more than a dozen films that featured screen swashbuckler Errol Flynn, as seen here in the inset.  He had a similar-looking son named after him who was placed in movies as a child and who grew up to work in many films and television shows.  Although the son worked until the late-1980s, he is chiefly known for his iconic role on a sitcom that only ran for three seasons (yet has never left the airwaves in reruns since!)

12. This exotic French beauty, shown in the inset with James Cagney, was a considerable movie actress of the 1920s and '30s when she met and married an up and coming hunk in 1935.  His career soon shot off like crazy while hers dwindled.  They had one child together before divorcing and she continued to draw spousal support from her ex until he was dead and gone.  Their very handsome son took a stab at acting, too, in less than ten movies (mostly foreign made) before switching gears to photojournalism.

13. Fans of the 1937 movie Lost Horizon will recall Margo (seen here with Horizon's Ronald Coleman), a Mexican actress who worked sporadically in TV and film up through the mid-'60s.  Though married first to actor Francis Lederer, she wed another, more familiar actor in 1945 and they were together until her death forty years later.  Their handsome son, named after his father, but resembling his mother more, went on to a more than forty-year career before the cameras himself when he was prematurely taken by lung cancer at only age fifty-five.

That concludes the quiz.  The answers will be shown below with a tad more commentary accompanying each answer!



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

1.  Vic Morrow's daughter is Jennifer Jason Leigh, costar of Fast Times at Ridgemont High (1982), The Hitcher (1986), Last Exit to Brooklyn (1989), Miami Blues (1990), Single White Female (1992) and Dolores Claiborne (1995), among many others.

2. The actor-director's name is Peter Masterson and his daughter is Mart Stuart Masterson, star of Some Kind of Wonderful (1987), Chances Are (1989), Fried Green Tomatoes (1991), Benny & Joon (1993) and Bad Girls (1994), among others.

3. Tisha Sterling's mother was Ann Sothern, through her six-year marriage to Robert Sterling.  Tisha played the young version of Sothern's character in The Whales of August (1987) for which Sothern was Oscar-nominated.

4. Blythe Danner is the mother of Gwyneth Paltrow through her thirty-two-year to writer-producer-director Bruce Paltrow.

5. Kyle Johnson's mother is none other than Star Trek's Nichelle Nichols (Lt. Uhura) from her brief marriage to Foster Johnson.

6. Whitney Blake's daughter is Meredith Baxter (star of Family and Family Ties) from her first marriage to Tom Baxter.  Ironically, Blake's name on Hazel was "Dorothy Baxter," though by then Blake was divorced from Baxter.

7. The Weitz brothers are the sons of Imitation of Life's Susan Kohner.  Kohner was married to John Weitz from 1964 until his death in 2002.

8. Paul Clemens is the son of The Sound of Music's (1965) elegant Baroness Schraeder, Eleanor Parker.  She was wed to artist Paul Clemens (Sr) from 1954-1965.

9. Marjorie Lord's daughter is Anne Archer, of Fatal Attraction (1987) and many other movies. Lord was married to actor John Archer from 1941 to 1953.

10. Sean Astin's mother is Patty Duke, who won an Oscar for The Miracle Worker (1962), was the star of The Patty Duke Show (1963-1966) and is part of the cult gay phenomena Valley of the Dolls (1967.)  Astin got his name from Duke's marriage to John Astin (1972-1985), but his father was really someone else.  During a manic phase of her bipolar disorder, she had slept with rock promoter Michael Tell, John Astin and Lucille Ball's son, Desi Arnaz Jr!  She married Tell for less than two weeks to "give her baby a name" all the while believing that Arnaz was the father.  Then she married Astin, who raised Sean.  Years later DNA tests confirmed that Tell was Sean's biological father.  If all this had been the plot of one of her movies, audiences would have claimed it was too far-fetched...

11. The character actor is Alan Hale and his son, Alan Hale Jr, played Skipper on Gilligan's Island from 1964-1967 and in a few reunion movies.

12. Actress Lili Damita wed Errol Flynn and gave birth to Sean Flynn.  Sean went missing during a photojournalism jaunt in Cambodia and was presumed dead in 1971 (officially declared so in 1984.)  A desperate Damita tried and tried to recover her son and only child, or at least his remains, but was unsuccessful.  After Errol Flynn's death (and the end of his spousal checks), Damita wed for a third time, but divorced again after twenty-one years.

13. Margo was married to movie actor and star of Green Acres (1965-1971) Eddie Albert and their son, Edward Albert, starred in Butterflies Are Free (1972) and many subsequent films.

My little bonus photo is coming up.  One of the most (in)famous parent-child Hollywood relationships was that of Joan Crawford and her adopted daughter Christina, who pursued acting as a girl.  (Most fans of Joan will recall her stepping into Christina's role on the daytime serial The Secret Storm for a couple of days during an illness.)  Apart from jobs that Joan helped arrange (like 1961's Wild in the Country), Christina had to settle for TV guest spots and work on the regional stage.  By 1972, she was completely done with screen acting after just a handful of jobs.

This photo, a promotional picture for the very popular series Medical Center (1969-1976) starring Chad Everett, was meant to publicize her guest appearance on a 1970 installment, but the newspaper thought so little of her that they cropped it to feature ONLY Everett and X-ed her out of the shot entirely!!  At the time, such a thing would have probably enraged Joan, who wished for Christina to succeed, but in retrospect, she's probably looking at this now from the great beyond with a karmic smirk.

Till the next moment I can rejoin you, my friends. Best wishes!

Hatchet Job?

Faye Dunaway once said (prior to her slamming the lid on the topic forever) that she believed that only God, Joan Crawford and Christina truly know what went on between the legendary movie star and her adopted child, referring to the sensational topics covered in the book (and resultant film, in which she starred) Mommie Dearest. I’m inclined to think she was right. Joan never got a chance to defend herself and too many people doubt Christina for her side to be taken at 100% value.
When Joan died in 1977, she famously left out of her will the two oldest of her four children (all adopted – a fifth one was returned early on when the family of the birth mother claimed him.) Her stated position in the document was “for reasons which are well known to them.” It has been written that Joan knew about her daughter’s forthcoming book as early as 1976 and that Christopher was supporting it and so that is why she took this action. She had been estranged from both of them for a varying number of years. Joan could never have imagined, however, the utter sensation that would arise from the book’s publication a year and a half after her death.

Literally, term papers could be written on the complex relationship between Joan and Christina. There is all sorts of evidence on both sides regarding the character of these two women and much dispute over the validity of Christina’s account, some in her favor and some not. Anything written in this post is my take on the matter based on much reading on the subject in books or interviews (or from watching filmed documentaries) and my own perceptions. As I said, I don’t think anyone outside the actual participants will ever know the whole truth.

What I can say is that if Joan knew that Christina was writing a tell-all book (really the first of its kind, exposing the tears behind the staged familial happiness of Tinseltown), one can’t blame her for excising her from the will, though if she’d had better advice, she would have left the pair a nominal sum to prevent them from contesting (which they did, earning them $22,500 apiece.) I mean, why leave money to someone who is sharpening his or her knives as you’re on the verge of succumbing to cancer?

I also have no doubt whatsoever that Joan was a person who believed in discipline and order. That much is obvious from studying her own life and the two younger children Cathy and Cindy have acknowledged that much themselves, though they stringently denied practically everything Christina wrote about in Mommie Dearest. Even though these two ladies only received around $77,500 themselves, they always staunchly defended their adoptive mother and, in fact, never spoke to either Christopher or Christina again following the publication of the book. The surviving sister Cathy won’t even refer to the book by name.

It’s easy to suggest that things could have been different amongst the siblings due to age difference, but that sort of falls apart when one realizes that Christina is only seven years older than the youngest children and Christopher was merely three years their senior! Only so much could have gone on without their knowledge when the ages were that close. I do suspect that there was a difference in the way Joan felt about her children because of their personality differences. It seems as if the younger two children were far more appreciative and compliant than the older two. (A cynic may suggest that they were that way because they saw what happened to you if you were the opposite!) Christina, on the other hand, has often been described by people who knew her as a willful, spoiled, bratty child and Christopher, likewise, as an unruly and difficult one. Christopher eventually had tangles with the law as a juvenile and was placed in a military academy.

Christina made much about being sent away to school, but all four children were. It was practically a given in Hollywood at that time for children to be boarded at a private school. Along the same lines, it was far more typical in those days for a parent to strike a child. My mother certainly spanked me (with a small oar, meant to be a souvenir, but giving me mementos of a different kind!) though after a while all she had to do was indicate my punishment and I straightened up quickly! Another time she gave me a royal tongue-lashing and even had her hair in a towel for that one. My father was far worse, chasing my sisters around and spanking and slapping them, but I was far too obedient with him to ever warrant any of that. I’m not condoning any of it, just saying that it was more common (and accepted/expected) in the past. I also realize that there is a difference between corporal punishment and abuse. The punishment I received as a kid taught me a sort of personal discipline and respect for authority that I tend to find sorely lacking in many of those younger than me. Considering the background Joan came from, it’s possible that any number of horrors occurred in her own childhood and equally possible that she utilized some severe methods in childrearing.

That said, she desperately wanted children of her own (once she was ready! She had aborted several fetuses early on.) I can’t believe that they were solely for the publicity. Joan Crawford was an astonishingly generous person. Countless stories, many of which will never be told because the participants are dead now, exist of her helping various crewmembers with bills and medical expenses, often anonymously. For many years she kept a hospital room (eventually two) available solely for those in need to use and all at her own expense. Her kindness extended even to her ex-husbands. When Franchot Tone was old and in a wheelchair, she helped care for and support him despite having had a tumultuous past with him. Her devotion to her fans, of course, was otherworldy. I feel like, no matter the end result, her heart was in the right place when she adopted her children. (Her youngest daughters described an idyllic childhood filled with many memorable experiences and travels and an abundance of love and caring physical contact, though they were not free of responsibilities and chores.)

When I first saw the movie Mommie Dearest, I was about 15. I didn’t find it campy at all that time and thought it was thoroughly horrifying! I couldn’t believe the fury I saw onscreen. The impromptu haircut, the raging, maniacal reaction to wire hangers and the near-strangulation in front of the Redbook reporter were all very vivid, shocking and gut-wrenching things to me. A few years later, after I’d been desensitized by this cruel world and developed my wicked sense of humor, I started to see the unintentional hilarity that many others had seen all along. Even so, no one can deny the volcanic intensity that Dunaway brought to those and other scenes. Ironically, I don't think that Joan on her best (worst?) day could have ever been as astronomically unhinged as Faye is here. It’s an endlessly fascinating specimen of screen performance. I realized that it most likely didn’t play out exactly like this in real life but, like many, assumed that the truth wasn’t too far off!

Later, I read the book, expecting to find even more mania and horror that there wasn’t room for in the movie. To my surprise, I found myself understanding some of Joan’s actions more than I had when I watched the film. For example, in the movie, Joan makes Christina eat rare meat for lunch and when she doesn’t finish it, she gets it for dinner and then for breakfast the next day. However, the movie never bothered to explain that Joan had obtained the prime rib on the black market (during WWII rationing) at great expense and was insulted and hurt that Christina then turned her nose up at it. No, this doesn’t make the incident any less horrible, but it at least sheds a grain of light on why Joan would feel so strongly about it.

This led me to feel that many other sequences in the film were either exaggerated or one-sided in their delivery. Even the night raid, a section of the film that is every bit as scary as it is funny, didn’t play out the way it was depicted. The movie combines two different alleged instances into one marathon of horror. In the book, the wire hangers tirade and the bathroom tirade were on separate nights. Again, this doesn’t condone the behavior, it just illustrates the way things were intensified and/or manipulated for the film for maximum impact. To top it all off, the book didn’t even include any beating with wire hangers! Joan’s entire life and reputation is now forever associated with something that didn’t occur the way the film suggests! Even Christina herself admitted that the movie was ramped up and inaccurate. See the attached article from Entertainment Weekly (click to enlarge.)

Christina wanted to write the movie, herself, but could never get any of her scripts green-lit. She, for some reason, seemed surprised that Hollywood producers didn’t want to make a movie that was mostly about her and not her more famous mother. She kept emphasizing that this was not a Hollywood story, but one of abuse, but how, with Joan as the villain, could it be anything else? Crawford lived and breathed stardom out of every pore. What ended up happening was that the makers whipped together and released a “Joan Crawford Movie” in the vein of Queen Bee, Harriet Craig, Berserk! and others. In other words, the movie became less about the real Joan and Christina and instead became an exploitive, inaccurate and (very) over-the-top motion picture that felt like a souped-up version of one of Joan’s own films!

Initially, Anne Bancroft was signed to star before backing out suddenly. She, to my mind, would have resembled the real Joan a lot more than Faye did. She had a similarly structured face and, most importantly, large eyes. Joan’s eyes were gargantuan. Dunaway’s not so much. Much ballyhoo was given to the “incredible” and “uncanny” makeover Dunaway was given in order to look the part, but, to me, she only looks like Joan for fleeting seconds at a time. I’ve never been happy with the way her eyebrows were handled. Yes, Joan had major eyebrows, but they were thick and real whereas Faye’s just look like they were drawn on with a Crayola marker. They were even shiny when the light hit them, as if there was no hair, but just colored skin!
The movie serves as interesting bridge for me as my favorite pre-1970 actress is Joan Crawford and my favorite post-1970 actress is Dunaway. I know that Joan may not be the very best ACTRESS who ever lived. I just find her unendingly captivating to watch and listen to. Same with Dunaway. I can watch her say and do almost anything, she’s that fascinating to me. I’m not alone in my thinking. In a bizarre bit of irony, when Crawford was quizzed in the latter part of her life about which up and coming actresses she thought highly of (a species she rarely took much of a cotton to in the first place!), she remarked, “Of all the actresses ... to me, only Faye Dunaway has the talent and the class and the courage it takes to make a real star.” I’ll say it for her. This is the thanks I get?? Ha ha!

Dunaway, who had become a mother to her son Liam close to the time of filming Mommie Dearest, was horrified at some of the things the script required her to say and do, though she certainly managed to overcome those fears and deliver a blistering performance. She felt haunted by Crawford during and, for a while, after the filming. When her work was received with cackles of hilarity and a Razzie award (when she believed that Oscar was going to be calling), her humiliation festered until finally she decided not to ever discuss the role again. It’s a shame she can’t borrow a page from Patty Duke (and her Valley of the Dolls fiasco) and embrace the fact that, regardless of the way things were, she has an army of fans who want her to talk about it and revel in it. No chance.

Anyway, back to Christina (and I do apologize that this posting is such a garbled mishmash!), in the wake of the publishing of the book and the publicity it engendered, along with the various hurdles of getting the movie (of which her then-husband was Executive Producer) made, she suffered a debilitating stroke. Her recovery from that, and the long and unusual journey of self-discovery that sprung from it, were detailed in a follow-up book called Survivor. It was in reading this book that I really began to feel that the first book was an exaggerated and (more importantly) self-obsessed hatchet job on her mother.

In Survivor, everything is always someone else’s fault. She comes across to me as a perpetual victim even though so many things that took place in her life were self-initiated. She speaks about contesting the will solely for her brother’s sake due to his being disabled and in financial difficulty, but after the initial mention of him, he is scarcely, if ever, referred to again. No one made her write the book or produce the film or go on the lecture tours (at which she was sometimes treated with hostility) unless you believe, as some do, that her husband did. It’s always the world against her. She seems never to have done any wrong.

Herman Cohen, who produced Joan’s last two feature films, claimed that Joan was generous to Christina around the time of her first marriage, giving her $5000 (at the time, a very decent sum) in his presence to do with what she pleased on her honeymoon. He recalled that her first husband knew nothing of the alleged mistreatment and had never heard the stories later told in Mommie Dearest, but that Christina’s second husband coerced her into writing it for the money. Joan also, despite wanting Christina to be able to stand on her own as an actress, arranged auditions and, in some cases, parts for her, such as in Wild in the Country, (that one through her close friend Jerry Wald.) Unfortunately, Christina did not only lack the striking looks of her adoptive mother, but she also didn’t possess her screen charisma (or even that which would be required of a steadily working actress.) It just wasn’t going to happen.

I think Joan was probably guilty of excessively strict discipline and discipline that had a sometimes cruel bent to it. For example, June Allyson told of witnessing Christina being shunned and disallowed to attend a party because of some infraction of the rules. She had to sit quietly with the present at her side for the same duration of time as the party. Christina also claimed that she was forced to wear a shredded dress around the house once because she absentmindedly ruined the wallpaper by her bed and if anyone asked her about her dress, she was instructed to answer, “I don’t like pretty things.” Again, I think Joan would become appalled if the expensive things she provided for her children were not, in her eyes, properly appreciated.

I, and I emphasize, I, do not believe a lot of the rest. Christina’s younger sisters claimed that after Joan died and Christina was shut out of the will, she went back over her book and peppered it with more and more horror stories and embellished the ones that were already there in an effort to bury Joan’s carefully structured and maintained reputation. On that count, it worked! Here’s what I found most callous, no matter what the truth is. One side claims that Christina had been working on the book prior to Joan’s death. She says no. She claims she didn’t begin writing it until afterwards. However, she says she started writing it barely one month after her mother’s death! A month and a half, tops. What sort of perspective could that allow?! Seriously… Your mother is buried about a month and you decide to write a reputation-killer that will forever stomp her memory into the ground? I don’t see how that’s any more admirable than having planned it before she passed away. At least Bette Davis’s equally selfish daughter fought the dragon while she was still alive to defend herself (and she did!) Christina also walked out on her corporate job the month her mother died, perhaps anticipating an inheritance that never materialized, and was in dire financial straits.

Faye Dunaway summed it up as the unavoidable clash that occurs when you put a “Child of Need” (Joan) up against a “Child of Want” (Christina.) Joan expected a level of gratitude that simply wasn’t there and never would be. She probably did some rotten things as a parent. Many parents did (and do) and yet the children grow up able to understand that people aren’t perfect, especially when they were younger and under various pressures, including career ones. In fact, regardless of any of this, if I have a message to anyone on this subject, it is to try to remember that our parents are people and, as such, they make mistakes. I made a choice to let go of some of the controversial things my mother said and did (and, for a brief time, that included several face-slappings!) over the years and it has resulted in a far closer relationship as adults than I once thought was possible. One reason I could do this is that I know that I am not perfect and in some cases my own behavior was not acceptable. I sometimes wonder if such a notion ever crossed Christina’s mind.